0.02/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.02/0.11 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 1920 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 240 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 09:44:04 EDT 2025 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.44 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.16/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p 1.20/0.66 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 1.20/0.66 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA. 1.20/0.66 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 1.20/0.66 # Starting lpo1_fix with 720s (3) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting almost_fo_4 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting new_ho_9 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # ho_unfolding_6 with pid 26533 completed with status 0 1.20/0.66 # Result found by ho_unfolding_6 1.20/0.66 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA. 1.20/0.66 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 1.20/0.66 # Starting lpo1_fix with 720s (3) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting almost_fo_4 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting new_ho_9 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # No SInE strategy applied 1.20/0.66 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSMMSBN 1.20/0.66 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN 1.20/0.66 # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 1.20/0.66 # Starting full_lambda_5 with 22s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # full_lambda_5 with pid 26538 completed with status 0 1.20/0.66 # Result found by full_lambda_5 1.20/0.66 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA. 1.20/0.66 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 1.20/0.66 # Starting lpo1_fix with 720s (3) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting almost_fo_4 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting new_ho_9 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # No SInE strategy applied 1.20/0.66 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSMMSBN 1.20/0.66 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN 1.20/0.66 # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 1.20/0.66 # Starting full_lambda_5 with 22s (1) cores 1.20/0.66 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s 1.20/0.66 # Presaturation interreduction done 1.20/0.66 1.20/0.66 # Proof found! 1.20/0.66 # SZS status Theorem 1.20/0.66 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_23, type, is_of: $i > ($i > $o) > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_24, type, all_of: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_26, type, in: $i > $i > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_62, type, imp: $o > $o > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_63, type, d_not: $o > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_72, type, non: $i > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_73, type, l_some: $i > ($i > $o) > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_78, type, e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_124, type, nat: $i). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_125, type, n_is: $i > $i > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_128, type, n_some: ($i > $o) > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_143, type, n_pl: $i > $i > $i). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_148, type, diffprop: $i > $i > $i > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_149, type, d_29_ii: $i > $i > $o). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_213, type, esk56_0: $i). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_214, type, esk57_0: $i). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_215, type, esk58_0: $i). 1.20/0.66 thf(decl_216, type, esk59_0: $i). 1.20/0.66 thf(def_d_not, axiom, ((d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:((imp @ ((X36)) @ (~($true)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', def_d_not)). 1.20/0.66 thf(def_imp, axiom, ((imp)=(^[X34:$o, X35:$o]:(((X34)=>(X35))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', def_imp)). 1.20/0.66 thf(def_all_of, axiom, ((all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:(((is_of @ X4 @ X3)=>(X2 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', def_all_of)). 1.20/0.66 thf(def_is_of, axiom, ((is_of)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:((X2 @ X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', def_is_of)). 1.20/0.66 thf(def_non, axiom, ((non)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:((d_not @ ((X2 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', def_non)). 1.20/0.66 thf(def_l_some, axiom, ((l_some)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:((d_not @ ((all_of @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4 @ X1))) @ (non @ X1 @ X2))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', def_l_some)). 1.20/0.66 thf(def_e_is, axiom, ((e_is)=(^[X1:$i, X60:$i, X61:$i]:(((X60)=(X61))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', def_e_is)). 1.20/0.66 thf(def_diffprop, axiom, ((diffprop)=(^[X1:$i, X183:$i, X4:$i]:((n_is @ X1 @ (n_pl @ X183 @ X4))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', def_diffprop)). 1.20/0.66 thf(def_n_is, axiom, ((n_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(Z1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', def_n_is)). 1.20/0.66 thf(def_d_29_ii, axiom, ((d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:((n_some @ (diffprop @ X1 @ X184))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', def_d_29_ii)). 1.20/0.66 thf(def_n_some, axiom, ((n_some)=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $o]:((((((![X441:$i]:(((((in @ X441 @ nat)))=>((((((Z0 @ X441)))=>(~($true))))))))))=>(~($true))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', def_n_some)). 1.20/0.66 thf(satz19a, conjecture, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X243:$i]:((in @ X243 @ nat))) @ (^[X244:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4 @ nat))) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((d_29_ii @ X1 @ X244)=>(d_29_ii @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4) @ (n_pl @ X244 @ X4)))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', satz19a)). 1.20/0.66 thf(satz5, axiom, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X214:$i]:((in @ X214 @ nat))) @ (^[X215:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4 @ nat))) @ (^[X4:$i]:((n_is @ (n_pl @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X215) @ X4) @ (n_pl @ X1 @ (n_pl @ X215 @ X4)))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', satz5)). 1.20/0.66 thf(satz6, axiom, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X259:$i]:((in @ X259 @ nat))) @ (^[X260:$i]:((n_is @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X260) @ (n_pl @ X260 @ X1)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Udbh7rZdg3/E---3.1_26450.p', satz6)). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_14, plain, ((d_not)=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$o]:(((((Z0))=>(~($true))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_not])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_15, plain, ((imp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:(((Z0)=>(Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_imp])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_16, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_17, plain, ((is_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i > $o]:((Z1 @ Z0)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_18, plain, ((non)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((((((Z1 @ Z2)))=>(~($true))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_non])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_19, plain, ((d_not)=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$o]:(((((Z0))=>(~($true))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_20, plain, ((l_some)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i > $o]:((((((![X414:$i]:(((((in @ X414 @ Z0)))=>((((((Z1 @ X414)))=>(~($true))))))))))=>(~($true))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_l_some])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_21, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_22, plain, ((non)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((((((Z1 @ Z2)))=>(~($true))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_23, plain, ((e_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i, Z2:$i]:(((Z1)=(Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_e_is])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_24, plain, ((l_some)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i > $o]:((((((![X414:$i]:(((((in @ X414 @ Z0)))=>((((((Z1 @ X414)))=>(~($true))))))))))=>(~($true))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_19]), c_0_22])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_25, plain, ((diffprop)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i, Z2:$i]:((((Z0)=(n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_diffprop])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_26, axiom, ((n_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(Z1))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is, c_0_23])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_27, plain, ((d_29_ii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((((((![X452:$i]:(((((in @ X452 @ nat)))=>(((((((((Z0)=(n_pl @ Z1 @ X452))))))=>(~($true))))))))))=>(~($true))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_28, axiom, ((n_some)=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $o]:((((((![X441:$i]:(((((in @ X441 @ nat)))=>((((((Z0 @ X441)))=>(~($true))))))))))=>(~($true))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_some, c_0_24])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_29, plain, ((diffprop)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i, Z2:$i]:((((Z0)=(n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_30, plain, ((d_29_ii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((((((![X452:$i]:(((((in @ X452 @ nat)))=>(((((((((Z0)=(n_pl @ Z1 @ X452))))))=>(~($true))))))))))=>(~($true))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28]), c_0_29])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ~(![X666:$i]:(((in @ X666 @ nat)=>![X665:$i]:(((in @ X665 @ nat)=>![X664:$i]:(((in @ X664 @ nat)=>((![X662:$i]:(((in @ X662 @ nat)=>(((X666)=(n_pl @ X665 @ X662))=>~($true))))=>~($true))=>(![X663:$i]:(((in @ X663 @ nat)=>(((n_pl @ X666 @ X664)=(n_pl @ (n_pl @ X665 @ X664) @ X663))=>~($true))))=>~($true)))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz19a])]), c_0_21]), c_0_30])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ![X1065:$i]:(((in @ esk56_0 @ nat)&((in @ esk57_0 @ nat)&((in @ esk58_0 @ nat)&((((in @ esk59_0 @ nat)|~($true))&((((esk56_0)=(n_pl @ esk57_0 @ esk59_0))|~($true))&(($true)|~($true))))&((~(in @ X1065 @ nat)|(((n_pl @ esk56_0 @ esk58_0)!=(n_pl @ (n_pl @ esk57_0 @ esk58_0) @ X1065))|~($true)))&($true))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])])])])])])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_33, plain, ![X602:$i]:(((in @ X602 @ nat)=>![X601:$i]:(((in @ X601 @ nat)=>![X600:$i]:(((in @ X600 @ nat)=>((n_pl @ (n_pl @ X602 @ X601) @ X600)=(n_pl @ X602 @ (n_pl @ X601 @ X600))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz5]), c_0_21]), c_0_26])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((~((in @ X1 @ nat))|((n_pl @ esk56_0 @ esk58_0)!=(n_pl @ (n_pl @ esk57_0 @ esk58_0) @ X1))|~(($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_35, plain, ![X997:$i, X998:$i, X999:$i]:((~(in @ X997 @ nat)|(~(in @ X998 @ nat)|(~(in @ X999 @ nat)|((n_pl @ (n_pl @ X997 @ X998) @ X999)=(n_pl @ X997 @ (n_pl @ X998 @ X999))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])])])])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_36, plain, ![X694:$i]:(((in @ X694 @ nat)=>![X693:$i]:(((in @ X693 @ nat)=>((n_pl @ X694 @ X693)=(n_pl @ X693 @ X694)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz6]), c_0_21]), c_0_26])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((n_pl @ esk56_0 @ esk58_0)!=(n_pl @ (n_pl @ esk57_0 @ esk58_0) @ X1))|~((in @ X1 @ nat)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_38, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((n_pl @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4) @ X5)=(n_pl @ X1 @ (n_pl @ X4 @ X5)))|~((in @ X1 @ nat))|~((in @ X4 @ nat))|~((in @ X5 @ nat)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk58_0 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk57_0 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_41, plain, ![X1092:$i, X1093:$i]:((~(in @ X1092 @ nat)|(~(in @ X1093 @ nat)|((n_pl @ X1092 @ X1093)=(n_pl @ X1093 @ X1092))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])])])])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, (((esk56_0)=(n_pl @ esk57_0 @ esk59_0))|~(($true))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ((in @ esk59_0 @ nat)|~(($true))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((n_pl @ esk57_0 @ (n_pl @ esk58_0 @ X1))!=(n_pl @ esk56_0 @ esk58_0))|~((in @ X1 @ nat)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38]), c_0_39]), c_0_40])])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_45, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i]:((((n_pl @ X1 @ X4)=(n_pl @ X4 @ X1))|~((in @ X1 @ nat))|~((in @ X4 @ nat)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, ((esk56_0)=(n_pl @ esk57_0 @ esk59_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_47, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk59_0 @ nat), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((n_pl @ esk57_0 @ (n_pl @ X1 @ esk58_0))!=(n_pl @ esk56_0 @ esk58_0))|~((in @ X1 @ nat)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_45]), c_0_39])])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_49, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((n_pl @ esk57_0 @ (n_pl @ esk59_0 @ X1))=(n_pl @ esk56_0 @ X1))|~((in @ X1 @ nat)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_46]), c_0_47]), c_0_40])])). 1.20/0.66 thf(c_0_50, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48, c_0_49]), c_0_47]), c_0_39])]), ['proof']). 1.20/0.66 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 1.20/0.66 # Parsed axioms : 369 1.20/0.66 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 1.20/0.66 # Initial clauses : 783 1.20/0.66 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 472 1.20/0.66 # Initial clauses in saturation : 311 1.20/0.66 # Processed clauses : 641 1.20/0.66 # ...of these trivial : 6 1.20/0.66 # ...subsumed : 66 1.20/0.66 # ...remaining for further processing : 569 1.20/0.66 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 88 1.20/0.66 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 1.20/0.66 # Backward-subsumed : 10 1.20/0.66 # Backward-rewritten : 3 1.20/0.66 # Generated clauses : 1817 1.20/0.66 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1756 1.20/0.66 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 1.20/0.66 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 13 1.20/0.66 # Paramodulations : 1641 1.20/0.66 # Factorizations : 2 1.20/0.66 # NegExts : 0 1.20/0.66 # Equation resolutions : 93 1.20/0.66 # Disequality decompositions : 0 1.20/0.66 # Total rewrite steps : 218 1.20/0.66 # ...of those cached : 187 1.20/0.66 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 1.20/0.66 # Propositional check models : 0 1.20/0.66 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 1.20/0.66 # Propositional clauses : 0 1.20/0.66 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 1.20/0.66 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 1.20/0.66 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 1.20/0.66 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 1.20/0.66 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 1.20/0.66 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 1.20/0.66 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 1.20/0.66 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 1.20/0.66 # Current number of processed clauses : 228 1.20/0.66 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 76 1.20/0.66 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2 1.20/0.66 # Negative unit clauses : 13 1.20/0.66 # Non-unit-clauses : 137 1.20/0.66 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1681 1.20/0.66 # ...number of literals in the above : 5756 1.20/0.66 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 1.20/0.66 # Current number of archived clauses : 286 1.20/0.66 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24517 1.20/0.66 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3765 1.20/0.66 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 72 1.20/0.66 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 487 1.20/0.66 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 14 1.20/0.66 # BW rewrite match attempts : 62 1.20/0.66 # BW rewrite match successes : 3 1.20/0.66 # Condensation attempts : 0 1.20/0.66 # Condensation successes : 0 1.20/0.66 # Termbank termtop insertions : 133139 1.20/0.66 # Search garbage collected termcells : 27748 1.20/0.66 1.20/0.66 # ------------------------------------------------- 1.20/0.66 # User time : 0.155 s 1.20/0.66 # System time : 0.012 s 1.20/0.66 # Total time : 0.167 s 1.20/0.66 # Maximum resident set size: 5964 pages 1.20/0.66 1.20/0.66 # ------------------------------------------------- 1.20/0.66 # User time : 0.161 s 1.20/0.66 # System time : 0.014 s 1.20/0.66 # Total time : 0.175 s 1.20/0.66 # Maximum resident set size: 2316 pages 1.20/0.66 % E exiting 1.20/0.66 % E exiting 1.20/0.66 EOF